TEHIC-Handbook_of_best_practices

6. Criteria for selecting best practices in heritage interpretation. TEHIC Towards a European Heritage Interpretation Curriculum 92 Thus, as mentioned above, when it comes to establishing such criteria, the Erasmus+ TEHIC working team set out to look for those aspects that may suggest that a project is something else than just a proper application of interpretation. In order to qualify a case as a best practice, we believe that it is necessary to take a step further, assessing those projects that change our reality, strengthen co-responsibility for heritage, inspire critical thinking, createnewnarrativesandnon-established readings, generateattitudes regarding heritage preservation, and provide cultural and social development in the territory. This is the reason why the following group of markers are proposed, seeking to iden - tify those transforming aspects of rootedness in the community, communicative effectiveness, and innovation of the message. We have sought to define some specific criteria, and within each of them to select those indicators that can help us in assessing heritage interpretation projects. Obviously, types of audiences, goals and means used in the field of heritage interpre - tation may vary widely. We know that it is not possible to assess in the same manner interpretive projects as diverse as: Interpretation Centre Les enfants de la vallée du fleuve Sénégal-Diiwánudexgui (The Children of the Senegal River Valley), Saint Louis, Senegal. Picture by Espiral Patrimonio.